On Thursday, the U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)But it’s not the first time They published the effects of COVID-19 patients and the activities in which they participated and the interactions they had in the two weeks prior to their positive respiratory disease test.
Researchers surveyed 314 adults in 10 U. S. states. (California, Colorado, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah and Washington) who won a COVID-19 check in July. Of those who participated in the study, 154 tested positive and 160 reviewed negative.
First, this is not surprising: 42% of ‘patient cases’, those who tested positive, reported that they had had close contact with someone who was known to have COVID-19 before symptoms appeared, compared to only 14% of them. who were in the organization (negative test). For any of the computers, most of the contacts nearby (51%) were with members of the family circle. And more than 70% of teams reported wearing a mask or mask when they were in public.
But CDC researchers also found that patient cases were much more likely (42%) organization’s patients (14%) who reported having dined at a place to eat or gone to a bar or café before getting sick. “Social use and distance are difficult to maintain, and going to places that provide food or drink in place can be vital threat points to get COVID-19,” the test authors wrote. “As communities reopen, efforts to reduce potential exposures in spaces that provide on-site food and beverage services deserve to be designed to protect customers, workers, and communities.
Whether or not they have visited a restaurant, bar or café, the main differentiator between the two teams. Approximately part of the participants reported going to buy groceries or having been in a space with less than 10 other people in the 14 days prior to their tests. however, “there is no significant difference” between positive and negative equipment in such cases.
Eating in a place to eat also gave the impression of being a more vital determinant of a positive check than a series of other activities, in addition to going to the office, visiting a hairdresser, going to a gym, taking public transport. or attend a devoted service.
“In this survey, participants with and without COVID-19 sometimes reported similar network exposures, with the exception of going to places with on-site food and beverage options,” the study says. “The direction, ventilation and intensity of airflow can transmit the virus, even if social distance measurements and mask use are implemented in accordance with existing guidelines. Masks can’t be used well when eating and drinking, while buying food and many other indoor activities don’t exclude masking. “
The CDC stated that this study had limitations, adding that its “I went to a restaurant” option did not differentiate between indoor meals and meals, and that bars and cafes were grouped into one category, even though they “could constitute other exhibitions. “
That said, CDC’s “eating position and bar considerations” mean that the least dangerous situation for eating food in position is driving, carrying, or delivering, or using street pickup. The biggest threat is eating on site in a position with indoors and outdoor seating, in a position that does not diminish its capacity and does not separate its tables at least six feet from each other.
But at this point, we all know we have dinner in this kind of place, don’t we?