The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tried Thursday to explain questionable rules about coronavirus tests published Monday that other people without symptoms “don’t necessarily want a test,” even if they’re exposed to an inflamed person.
The medical network had criticized the agency’s more flexible guidelines, which some scientists say had been developed for political rather than clinical reasons. President Donald Trump said the large number of coronavirus cases in the United States was the result of widespread testing, this is not supported by the number of deaths and hospitalizations.
Public fitness officials say that testing others that they may have been exposed to COVID-19, whether or not they have symptoms, is critical to knowing how many other people in the United States are inflamed with COVID-19. It also enables effective contact search and quarantine to prevent virus spread.
Prior to Monday, the CDC’s online page said the verification was “for all close contacts of others with SARS-CoV-2 infection,” the virus that causes COVID-19.
On Monday, this replaced saying that a user who was in close contact (less than 6 feet) of a user with COVID-19 for at least 15 minutes but had no symptoms does not “necessarily want a test”.
Guidelines published Thursday through CDC Director Robert Redfield mean that those who come into contact with a patient with COVID-19 shown or likely can simply be evaluated, even if they show no symptoms.
Testing others who have potentially been exposed to COVID-19 helps public fitness efforts prevent the spread of the virus, said Dr. Tom Frieden, president and CEO of Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies.
“What’s the tact test like? Important – this way you can find, insinuate and prevent the transmission chains,” he said.
“There are still things that tell us about the contacts that need to be verified, when and how to use this information, however, it is transparent that if we do not review asymptomatic contacts, we will lose the transmission chains and weaken our ability to stop the virus. “he says.
Without the tests, locating contacts becomes very complicated because others are told to quarantine themselves for 14 days without having the ability to know if they are infected, said Dr. William Schaffner, a professor in vanderbilt University’s Division of Preventive Medicine and Infectious Diseases. . Nashville, Tennessee.
Monday’s review meant that “people scratched their heads and was a little surprised,” Schaffner said. “We were going to expand the evidence, especially in asymptomatic people.”
Dr. Brett Giroir, HHS undersecretary of health, said at a press convention Wednesday that the replacement was intended to encourage “more appropriate evidence, not less evidence.”
The rules published on Monday mean that exceptions may be made for other vulnerable people or those who have been evaluated through a physical health service provider or a public fitness officer.
CDC faces political pressure
The CDC faced enormous pressures and doubts during the pandemic. This is partly due to the first missteps in the flawed tests they did not paint and an imaginable political contribution to their rules on the reopening of schools.
CNN reported Wednesday that the replacement in the verification criteria is due to the political tension of the Trump administration’s higher levels.
Trump has reported that higher degrees of verification in the United States are to blame for his increased number of cases.
The United States leads the world in the number of reported cases of COVID-19, according to Johns Hopkins University. As of Thursday, the United States accounted for approximately 24% of reported cases worldwide and approximately 22% of COVID-19 deaths, however, account for approximately 4% of the reported population.
At a rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in June, Trump told the crowd that the United States had already conducted 25 million tests. “When you run tests up to this point, you’re going to locate more people, you’re going to locate more cases, so I said to my team, “Slow down the tests, please. “”
The next day, White House industrial adviser Peter Navarro said Trump’s comment was “ironic.”
This week’s coming and go undermines public confidence in government fitness facilities at a time when it’s most necessary, said Dr. Peter Hotez, Dean of Baylor Medical School’s National School of Tropical Medicine.
“The original rules don’t make sense because they weren’t backed by science,” he said. The other Americans are wasting their trust in the reaction of American public fitness to COVID-19.
Redfield’s said Thursday that “anyone who wants a COVID-19 check can take a check.”
But, he said, “anyone who needs a check doesn’t necessarily want a check; the key is to involve the public fitness network in the resolution with the appropriate follow-up measures.
Public fitness physicians agreed with this claim, as COVID-19 tests in the United States are still rare in some areas. Pre-summer arrears meant that other people had to wait a week to get the results, larger advertising labs say they now have an average of two days.
Therefore, it makes sense to discourage others who are among the “well worried” to get tested, Schaffner said. “Letting Suzy or Frank off the street can discourage that,” he says.