Age-stratified suicide death rates in South Africa by year and sex (n = 12703).
We fitted Poisson regression models to estimate associations between crude suicide rates and year (ie, 2020/2021 vs 2017), stratified by sex. No significant associations were observed between crude suicide rates and year for both sexes combined (risk ratio (RR)=1.04 (1.00, 1.07)), males (RR=1.03 (0.99, 1.07)) or females (RR=1.05 (0.97, 1.13)).
To determine if there were significant adjustments in the age distribution of suicide rates between 2017 and 2020/2021, we adjust Poisson regression models, stratified according to the organization by sex and age (see Table 2). A significant provision was observed in the organization by age. 15 to 24 years among men (RR = 1. 11 (1. 01, 1. 21)) and women (RR = 1. 31 (1,13, 1. 52)) indicating an increase in suicide rates In this age organization during the short pandemic of -19. No significant agreements were observed in any of the other age organizations.
Table 3 presents the effects of a fish regression study of associations between gross suicide rates and various combinations of alcohol restrictions and containment levels, stratified by sex. In terms of confinement 1, the threat of suicide was not associated with other periods of partial restrictions on the sale of alcohol, compared to periods without alcohol restriction for both sexes combined (RR = 1. 09 (1Array 00, 1. 19)), men (RR = 1. 08 (0. 98, 1. 19)) or women (RR = 1. 15 (0. 92, 1. 44)). During periods of partial alcohol restriction, the threat of suicide at all degrees of restraint was no different from periods without restraint except in terms of containment 2, where the threat of suicide was 14% higher for both sexes combined (RR = 1. 14 (1. 02; 1. 27). )) and 45% higher for women (RR = 1. 45 (1. 13, 1. 87)).
However, within containment point 3, the threat of suicide (compared to periods without restrictions) was particularly decreased from periods of full restrictions on alcohol than periods of partial restrictions for either sex combined (RR = 0. 82 (0. 75, 0. 90) versus 1. 00 (0. 90). These insights recommend that transitioning from partial alcohol restrictions to full alcohol restrictions at point 3 resulted in an 18% (95% CI 10% to 25%) relief of the suicide threat for the sexes combined and a 22% relief (95% CI thirteen % to 25 %). % to 30%) Suicide relief in men, but no significant relief in women.
Finally, in times of general alcohol restriction, the threat of suicide compared to times without restriction was particularly lower in all degrees of confinement, for both sexes combined and for men. For both sexes combined, the relative RRs were 0. 82 (0. 75, 0. 90), 0. 72 (0. 64, 0. 82), and 0. 63 (0. 56, 0. 72) in grades 3, 4, and 5, respectively. For men, the corresponding relative RRs were 0. 78 (0. 70, 0. 87), 0. 66 (0. 57, 0. 76), and 0. 63 (0. 55, 0. 73). However, another trend was observed among women, with point five of confinement being the only period related to a reduction in the threat of suicide (RR = 0. 64 (0. four6, 0. 88)).
Table four has estimates of raw suicide rates consisting with 100,000 population of other blocking degrees and alcohol restrictions. According to the effects of our regression analysis, those knowledge shows that the suicide rates of consistency without alcohol restrictions (12. 03 (11. 07, 13. 00) consisting of 100,000 population) were not particularly other of the suicide rates observed when they were imposed Partial alcohol restrictions. Point 1 (13. 12 (12. 56, 13. 69) consisting of 100,000). However, moving from partial to complete restrictions at blocking point 3 was related to significant relief in raw suicide rates, from 12. 00 (11. 18, 12. 83) to 9. 90 (9. Fuerz1, 10. 39) according to 100,000.
We used data from nationally representative postmortem surveys to investigate whether changes in suicide deaths were associated with various alcohol restrictions implemented intermittently during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa. Although suicide rates did not change significantly between 2017 and the first year of the pandemic, we found that during the pandemic, complete restrictions on the sale of alcohol were associated with a significant reduction in suicide rates. Although partial alcohol restrictions were not associated with any significant reductions in suicide rates, the shift from partial to full restrictions coincided with an 18% reduction in risk of suicide, equivalent to a change in crude suicide mortality rates from 12·0 per 100 000 to 9.90 per 100 000.
Our knowledge implies that the age-standardized mortality rate through suicide in South Africa (consistent with 100,000 inhabitants) was 10. 91 (10. 64, 11. 18) in 2017 and 10. 82 (10. 56array 11. 08) in 2020/2021, suicide rates They are approximately 4. 4 times higher. in men during the two coherent years. These suicide prevalence estimates are aligned with the WHO estimate of the global age-standardized mortality rate through suicide for 2019 of 9. 2 consistent with 100,000 (9. 7-12. 6) Array32. It is vital to note that Our estimate of age-standardized suicide rates for South Africa is a significant decrease than that of age-standardized suicide rates. WHO estimates for South Africa of 23. 5 per 100,000 (16. 0–32. 2) for 201932, raising vital questions about the accuracy of WHO models. Our estimates of suicide mortality in South Africa are likely underestimates due to an underdistribution of suicide deaths due to social, cultural and devotional taboos related to suicide. 33 34 Even if lower, this was probably systematically replaced between 2017 and 2020, so it does not affect the effects of our analysis.
We did not discover evidence that the suicide rate in South Africa during the first year of the Covid pandemic was particularly different from the suicide rate in 2017. Likewise, no differences in the age or distribution of suicides between those two times between those two times were observed , unless you increase suicides among young people aged 15 to 24 during the Covid era between men and women. Our effects are consistent with global knowledge that seems that Covid-19 pandemic has not caused a marked increase in suicides despite the expectations that it could be imaginable. Africa, 37 as also happens with the knowledge of suicide in general. There are few studies from low and medium -sized income countries that use reliable and representative knowledge at the national level and during the COVID and physically powerful statistical methods. PIRKIS ET AL35 argued that an imaginable explanation of why suicide rates did not increase during the Covid pandemic was that governments temporarily implemented mitigation methods, which included social and monetary support. Our knowledge suggests that adjustments in alcohol policy during pandemic would probably also have been one of the methods that stopped the increase in suicide rates. This speculation is backed by evidence of a decrease in alcohol consumption at the population level during pandemic 39, 40 and studies that in the past have demonstrated discounts on suicidal habit when access to alcohol is restricted. 2 7 7
Our knowledge provides some support for the speculation that population-level restriction of alcohol intake may be an effective component of national suicide prevention strategies, as has also been proposed by other researchers. Increase alcohol costs (e. g. through minimum legislation and/or taxes), restricting the number of alcohol sales outlets, restrict trading hours for alcohol sales, extend the ‘legal drinking age legal and prohibit the market and advertising of alcohol. 2 41 42 Such public policy measures are likely to be thwarted by difficult industry and marketer interests that continue to influence alcohol policy and law 43 43 in specific Africa and other PRFMs. 44 Multinational alcohol manufacturers have actively sought to increase the market share and influence the law in African countries when there is political instability and/or low state mechanisms to regulate the market, prices, distribution and sale of alcohol. Forty-five there is, for example, transparent evidence that national alcohol policy documents in Lesotho, Malawi, Uganda and Botswana reflect industry interests, focusing attention on individual habit and ignoring population interventions. Most effective in restricting the destructive effects of alcohol. 21 46
While our findings suggest that restricting access to alcohol at a population level could help reduce suicide rates, we have no evidence to show that this strategy would be effective outside of a global pandemic or that the impact would be sustained over a protracted period. It is likely that longer term complete bans on alcohol would have other social consequences, such as precipitating illicit manufacture and trade of alcohol or shifts to consumption of other drugs, which would dampen any protective effects of alcohol restrictions. Importantly, our findings show that partial restrictions on the sale of alcohol were not associated with reductions in suicide rates and that alcohol restrictions are more likely to have an impact on male suicide rates. It will be important for future studies to establish if this pattern is also observed in South Africa in the absence of social distancing and outside of a global pandemic.
The main limitations of our examination come with the fact that we have no knowledge for the time without delay before the pandemic and that we trust the knowledge of 2017 to evaluate the prospective have an effect on Covid. Other variables can play a role in some of our observed effects, with the maximum apparent attention here as the touches of other lengths that were instituted throughout alcohol restrictions as a component of a broader set of blocking restrictions. However, recent studies report that they do not have a significant effect on currency touches on mortality rates24 47 and lesions23 during this era.
Additionally, we only looked at knowledge collected during the first year of the pandemic, and it is unclear whether Covid would have possibly caused a build in suicide rates after March 2021. It is conceivable that suicide rates would have an updated post-COVID build. covid, contemplating the long-term situation. detrimental economic consequences of the pandemic48 and consistent evidence of associations between poverty and suicides in LMICs. 49 It is vital to note that our analyzes of associations between suicide and alcohol restrictions are based on knowledge gathered during the first year of the Covid pandemic, making it difficult to analyze associations between suicide and alcohol restrictions. Generalize our effects to non-pandemic periods. However, this is the first knowledge from sub-Saharan Africa to report suicide rates using nationally representative knowledge collected before and during the pandemic. This is necessarily one of the few studies conducted in an LMIC and, to our knowledge, the only African examination of reporting associations between alcohol restrictions and suicide.
Our effects provide forged evidence of a PRFI according to which suicide rates have not higher the first year of the COVVI-19 Pandemic, which agrees with the effects received in the main source of income countries. Although the hypothesis that suicide rates globally have not exceed Possibly it would also have had a protective effect on pandemic suicide rates. First year of Pandemia. Basically, our effects recommend that cutting alcohol intake at the point of the population can also be an effective detail of national suicide prevention strategies, in specifications in Prfi, where the alcohol industry continues to resist the stresses of the state destined to Reduce the destructive effects of alcohol intake. through measures such as the minimum price. Laws, restrictions on negotiation hours and advertising marketing and alcohol prohibitions.
Back to top