The guy had mild symptoms the first time and none at the time; its latest infection detected by examinations and tests at Hong Kong airport
Scientists at the University of Hong Kong claim to have the first evidence that a user re-inflamed with the guilty COVID-19 virus. Genetic testing revealed that a 33-year-old man returning to Hong Kong from Spain in mid-August had another strain of coronavirus that had already become inflamed in March, said Dr. Kelvin Kai-Wang, the microbiologist. who led the job.
The guy had mild symptoms the first time and none at the time; its maximum recent infection detected by screening and testing at Hong Kong Airport. “This shows that some other people are not immune to the virus for life if they have already been immunized,” To said. We don’t know how other people can be reinfected. There’s probably others out there. “The article has been accepted through the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, but has not yet been published, and some independent experts have asked for caution until the full effects become available.
The question of whether others who have had COVID-19 are immune to new infections and for how long they are key problems that have implications for vaccine progression and social decisions and back to school. Although a user would possibly become inflamed for a moment, it is not known whether he opposes a serious illness, as the immune formula regularly remembers how to manufacture antibodies opposed to a virus he has already seen.
Read also: The distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine in case of special emergency uses an idea: Anthony Fauci
It is not known how different a virus will have to be to cause a disease, but new studies suggest that patients with COVID deserve not to be content with preventive measures. and deserve to continue social estrangement, disguised as a mask and other tactics to lessen the infection, A said. Two paperless experts in the paintings agree. “We knew that reinfection is an option and I think it strongly suggests what happened in this case,” said Dr. Jesse Goodman, a leading former scientist at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration now at Georgetown University.
“If there is reinfection, it suggests the option of a residual immunity matrix … that helped protect the patient” from a new illness, Goodman said. However, if immunity decreases due to an herbal infection, this can also be a challenge for vaccines and possibly means booster injections are needed, he added. Julie Fischer, a microbiologist at CRDF Global, a nonprofit fitness organization in Arlington, Virginia, said the review provided compelling evidence that reinfection can also occur.
Read also: Eight-time Olympic gold medalist Usain Bolt COVID-19 positive
“The genuine question is what it means for the severity of the disease if it happens and whether those other people can infect other people,” he said. An expert saw the report as good news. Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, said it is encouraging that the reported reinfection has not had symptoms.
“This is a victory for me” because it suggests that a first infection may be just a user of a moderate to severe illness at the time, he said in an interview published through the Journal of the American Medical Association. A mid-May survey conducted through the Sermo physician information exchange site found that 13% of the 4,173 doctors who responded to the idea that they had treated one or more reinfected patients. Among respondents, 7% of those in the United States and 16% in other countries believe they have noticed such a case.
However, fitness officials also questioned whether other people who tested positive long after their initial illness simply showed symptoms of not getting rid of the virus at all than re-inflamed.
Read also: Trump administration believes Oxford COVID-19 vaccine accelerated ahead of election
Speak now